ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Importance Public health vaccination recommendations for COVID-19 primary series and boosters in previously infected individuals differ worldwide. As infection with SARS-CoV-2 is often asymptomatic, it remains to be determined if vaccine immunogenicity is comparable in all previously infected subjects. We present detailed immunological evidence to clarify the requirements for one-or two-dose primary vaccination series for naturally primed individuals. Objective Evaluate the immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in healthcare workers (HCWs) who recovered from a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Design Multicentric observational prospective cohort study of HCWs with a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection designed to evaluate the dynamics of T and B cells immune responses to primary infection and COVID-19 mRNA vaccination over 12 months. Participants Unvaccinated HCWs with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were selected based on the presence or absence of symptoms at infection and serostatus at enrollment. Age- and sex-matched adults not infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination were included as naïve controls. Exposure Vaccination with Pfizer BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Immunity score (zero to three), before and after vaccination, based on anti-RBD IgG ratio, serum capacity to neutralize live virus and IFN-γ secretion capacity in response to SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools above the positivity threshold for each of the three assays. We compared the immunity score between groups based on subjects’ symptoms at diagnosis and/or serostatus prior to vaccination. Results None of the naïve participants (n=14) showed a maximal immunity score of three following one dose of vaccine compared to 84% of the previously infected participants (n=55). All recovered individuals who did not have an immunity score of three were seronegative prior to vaccination, and 67% had not reported symptoms resulting from their initial infection. Following one dose of vaccine, their immune responses were comparable to naïve individuals, with significantly weaker responses than those who were symptomatic during infection. Conclusions and Relevance Individuals who did not develop symptoms during their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection and were seronegative prior to vaccination present immune responses comparable to that of naïve individuals. These findings highlight the importance of administering the complete two-dose primary regimen and following boosters of mRNA vaccines to individuals who experienced asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. KEY POINTS Question Is a single dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine sufficient to induce robust immune responses in individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection? Findings In this cohort of 55 health care workers previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, we show that the absence of symptoms during initial infection and negative serostatus prior to vaccination predict the strength of immune responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Lack of symptoms and a negative serostatus prior to vaccination leads to immune responses comparable to naïve individuals. Meaning Our results support a two-dose primary series requirement for any individual with prior history of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background : Understanding the immune response to natural infection by SARS-CoV-2 is key to pandemic management, especially in the current context of emerging variants. Uncertainty remains regarding the efficacy and duration of natural immunity against reinfection. Method : We conducted an observational prospective cohort study in Canadian healthcare workers (HCWs) with a history of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to : (i) measure the average incidence rate of reinfection and (ii), describe the serological immune response to the primary infection. Results : We detected 5 cases of reinfection over 14 months of follow-up, for a reinfection incidence rate of 3.3 per 100 person-years. Median duration of seropositivity was 420 days in symptomatics at primary infection compared to 213 days in asymptomatics (p<0.0001). Other variables associated with prolonged seropositivity for IgG against the spike protein included age 55 and above, obesity, and non-Caucasian ethnicity. Summary : Among healthcare workers, the incidence of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 following a primary infection remained rare, although our analysis predates the circulation of the Omicron variant.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , ObesityABSTRACT
AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSWe evaluated the use of rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in school settings to determine RADTs performance compared to PCR. MethodsIn this real-world, prospective observational cohort study, high-school students and staff were recruited from two high-schools in Montreal (Canada) and followed from January 25th to June 10th, 2021. Twenty-five percent of asymptomatic participants were tested weekly by RADT (nasal) and PCR (gargle). Class contacts of cases were tested. Symptomatic participants were tested by RADT (nasal) and PCR (nasal and gargle). The number of cases and outbreaks were compared to other high schools in the same area. ResultsOverall, 2,099 students and 286 school staff members consented to participate. The overall RADTs specificity varied from 99.8 to 100%, with a lower sensitivity, varying from 28.6% in asymptomatic to 83.3% in symptomatic participants. Secondary cases were identified in 10 of 35 classes. Returning students to school after a 7-day quarantine, with a negative PCR on D6-7 after exposure, did not lead to subsequent outbreaks. Of cases for whom the source was known, 37 of 57 (72.5%) were secondary to household transmission, 13 (25%) to intra-school transmission and one to community contacts between students in the same school. ConclusionRADT did not perform well as a screening tool in asymptomatic individuals. Reinforcing policies for symptom screening when entering schools and testing symptomatic individuals with RADT on the spot may avoid subsequent significant exposures in class. Table of Contents SummaryRapid antigen tests were compared to standard PCR to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infections in high-school students. They performed better in symptomatic individuals. Whats Known on This SubjectRapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are often used to diagnose respiratory pathogens at the point-of-care. Their performance characteristics vary, but they usually have high specificity and moderate sensitivity compared with PCR. What This Study AddsRADT sensitivity ranged from 28.6% in asymptomatic individuals to 83.3% in symptomatic individuals. Return to school after 7 days of quarantine was safe in exposed students. Secondary cases were identified in 28% of classes with an index case.